Federal
Congress Urged to Act on Haitian TPS After Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to End Program
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians living in the United States. The House previously passed a bill 224-204 to extend TPS for Haiti, with support from 10 Republicans including two Ohio representatives. That bill has stalled in the Senate, where supporters lack the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. Democrats are calling on the Senate to take up the House bill, while most Republicans and the White House support the Court's decision, arguing TPS was always meant to be temporary.
✓ REASONS TO SUPPORT
- Thousands of Haitians currently living legally in the U.S. under TPS could lose their status, and an extension would let them remain legally while conditions in Haiti remain dangerous.
- The House already passed a bipartisan TPS extension with support from members of both parties, including 10 Republicans.
- Haitians with TPS are described by supporters as living here legally, meaning an extension maintains an existing lawful arrangement.
- Allowing TPS holders to remain provides stability for communities, like those in Ohio, where Haitian immigrants have settled.
✕ REASONS TO OPPOSE
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that ending TPS is lawful, affirming the administration's authority to let the program expire.
- Supporters of ending TPS argue the program was always meant to be temporary, and extending it repeatedly undermines that intent.
- The Senate currently lacks 60 votes to advance the extension, suggesting broad opposition among Republican senators.
- The White House and many Republicans argue ending TPS is part of restoring order to immigration enforcement and border security.
Read the full bill ↗
Send a postcard to your representatives